Sample report · Line Mapping

See what lands on the table at the readout

Pages from a sample Line Mapping report for Larchmere Cabinetry, a fictional cabinet maker. The company and every number are invented. The method, the layout and the honesty are the real thing.

Pages from the sample report

ExponaThe short version
The short version

Larchmere spends about $245,000 a year getting ready to decide.

That is about 3,800 hours across nine decisions, at the rates Dana confirmed. 54% of it sits in two of them, and both are ready to build.

3,800

hours a year of assembly before a decision

$245k

a year at fully loaded rates

9

decisions mapped, timed and scored

2

worth building now, out of nine

Our recommendation

Build dealer assignment for quote requests first.

Each lead in the manual queue arrives with one card: every eligible dealer, why it is eligible, its response stats and any pause, dated as of last night. The lead team still makes every call. Track A, about 4 weeks, $18,000 to $22,000.

All nine, by quadrant
Build first
L1 Dealer assignment$72,960
L2 Bid pursuit$58,548
Fix first
L3 Dealer development$31,680
L4 Special pricing$29,568
Batch or skip
L5 Co-op claims$21,600
L6 Display requests$12,240
L8 Designer applications$5,760
Do not build
L7 At risk review$9,504
L9 Home show leads$3,360
ExponaFictional sample · Larchmere Cabinetry02 / 16

The full sample

Get all 16 pages by email

Four full line maps, the scoring, the build plan, the fix first work, the thirty, sixty, ninety plan and the event lines. We send it to a work address, so it reaches the person who will use it.

One email with the PDF. No newsletter unless you ask for one.

The companion sample

The baseline is where the decision lines came from. See what it found.

Sample AI Adoption Baseline

Questions

About this sample

Is this a real client report?

No. Larchmere Cabinetry is invented, and so is every line, number and name in it. We built the sample so you can read a finished report without a client's operations ending up on a public page. The structure is the one we ship.

What is in the full Line Mapping report?

Sixteen pages: four full line maps, the feasibility scoring, the arithmetic behind each estimate, the build plan, the fix first work, a thirty, sixty and ninety day plan, the event lines, and a do not build list with a reason on every entry.

Why is there a do not build list?

Because the useful half of the answer is often no. A line that looks like a candidate can fail on data, on volume or on the fact that the judgment in it is the job. We write down which ones failed and why, so nobody spends a quarter rediscovering it.

Will my report look like this one?

Same shape, your work. The tabs here are four pages out of sixteen, picked because they show the method. What changes is the lines we map, what the arithmetic says about them and which ones end up on the do not build list.